| Composition | gram |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0.4 |
| Carbohydrate | 33.9 |
| Protein | 2.8 |
| Dietary fibre | 1.0 |
| Alcohol | 0.0 |
| Water | 62.0 |
| Energy content | energiprosent |
|---|---|
| Fat | 2 |
| Carbohydrate | 89 |
| Protein | 7 |
| Dietary fibre | 1 |
| Alcohol | 0 |
| Nutrient | Source | Quantity | Energiprosent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fat | 2 E% | ||
| Carbohydrate | 89 E% | ||
| Dietary fibre | 1 E% | ||
| Protein | 7 E% | ||
| Alcohol | 0 E% | ||
| Water | - |
| Carbohydrate | Source | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Starch | ||
| Sugar, total | ||
| Sugar, added | ||
| Sugar, free |
| Fat | Source | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Saturated fatty acids | ||
| Trans fatty acids | ||
| Monounsaturated fatty acids | ||
| Polyunsaturated fatty acids | ||
| Omega-3 | ||
| Omega-6 | ||
| Cholesterol |
| Saturated fatty acids | Source | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| C12:0 (lauric acid) | ||
| C14:0 (myristic acid) | ||
| C16:0 (palmitic acid) | ||
| C18:0 (stearic acid) |
| Monounsaturated fatty acids | Source | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| C16:1 sum (palmitoleic acid) | ||
| C18:1 sum (oleic acid) |
| Fat-soluble vitamins | Source | Quantity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (RAE) | |||
| Vitamin A (RE) | 0 RE | 0 % | |
| Retinol | |||
| Beta-carotene | |||
| Vitamin D | 0 % | ||
| Vitamin E | 0 % |
| Minerals | Source | Quantity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salt (NaCl) | |||
| Calcium (Ca) | 0 % | ||
| Sodium (Na) | |||
| Potassium (K) | 0 % | ||
| Magnesium (Mg) | 1 % | ||
| Phosphorus (P) | 5 % |
| Trace elements | Source | Quantity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron (Fe) | 0 % | ||
| Zinc (Zn) | 3 % | ||
| Selenium (Se) | 1 % | ||
| Copper (Cu) | 7 % | ||
| Iodine (I) | 14 % |
Food ID: 05.521
Scientific name: Oryza sativa L.
| Facets | |
|---|---|
| F01 Source | Rice (as plant) (A059Y) |
| F02 Part-nature | Grains (as part-nature) (A066Q) |
| F27 Source-commodities | Rice grain (A001D) |
| F28 Process | Boiling (A07GL) |
The foods in the Food Composition Table are described using two classification systems.
FoodEx2 is a classification and standardization system for foods and feed developed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The system consists of a main code that describes the type of food. In addition, there are facets that provide more detailed information about the food, for example about ingredients, packaging, or method of preparation.
LanguaL is a similar system. LanguaL stands for “Langua aLimentaria”, or “language of food”. It also consists of a description of the type of food, and facets with additional information.
Missing value, content not known.
Estimated as a naturally occurring zero value, not analysed.
Livsmedelsverket. Cereal and potato products 2022. Analysis of nutrients. Livsmedelsverket, Uppsala, 2023. Online version, www.livsmedelsverket.se
Salt equivalent calculated from sodium (NACL[g]=2.5*NA[mg]/1000.0)
Water by difference (WATER[g] = 100 - PROT[g] - FAT[g] - CHO[g] - FIBT[g] - ALC[g])
Carbohydrate, available calculated from sugar and starch (CHO[g] = SUGAR[g] + STARCH[g])
Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food
Vitamin A activity calculated from retinol and beta-carotene (factor 1/6) (VITA[µg] = RETOL[µg] + (CARTB[µg] / 6))
Vitamin A activity calculated from retinol and beta-carotene (factor 1/12) (VITA[µg] = RETOL[µg] + (CARTB[µg] / 12))
Niacin equivalents calculated from niacin and tryptophan (NIAEQ[mg] = NIA[mg] + TRP[mg] / 60)
Sugar calculated as the sum of individual mono- and disaccharides (SUGAR[g] = ARAS[g] + FRUS[g] + GALS[g] + GLUS[g] + MANS[g] + RIBS[g] + XYLS[g] + LACS[g] + MALS[g] + SUCS[g] + TRES[g])
Missing value, content not known.
Estimated as a naturally occurring zero value, not analysed.
Livsmedelsverket. Cereal and potato products 2022. Analysis of nutrients. Livsmedelsverket, Uppsala, 2023. Online version, www.livsmedelsverket.se
Salt equivalent calculated from sodium (NACL[g]=2.5*NA[mg]/1000.0)
Water by difference (WATER[g] = 100 - PROT[g] - FAT[g] - CHO[g] - FIBT[g] - ALC[g])
Carbohydrate, available calculated from sugar and starch (CHO[g] = SUGAR[g] + STARCH[g])
Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food
Vitamin A activity calculated from retinol and beta-carotene (factor 1/6) (VITA[µg] = RETOL[µg] + (CARTB[µg] / 6))
Vitamin A activity calculated from retinol and beta-carotene (factor 1/12) (VITA[µg] = RETOL[µg] + (CARTB[µg] / 12))
Niacin equivalents calculated from niacin and tryptophan (NIAEQ[mg] = NIA[mg] + TRP[mg] / 60)
Sugar calculated as the sum of individual mono- and disaccharides (SUGAR[g] = ARAS[g] + FRUS[g] + GALS[g] + GLUS[g] + MANS[g] + RIBS[g] + XYLS[g] + LACS[g] + MALS[g] + SUCS[g] + TRES[g])
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Below limit of quantification |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Calculations including conversion factors |
| Method indicator | Vitamin A activity calculated from retinol and beta-carotene (factor 1/12) (VITA[µg] = RETOL[µg] + (CARTB[µg] / 12)) |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Below limit of quantification |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Polarimetry |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Summation from constituent components |
| Method indicator | Water by difference (WATER[g] = 100 - PROT[g] - FAT[g] - CHO[g] - FIBT[g] - ALC[g]) |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Food composition table |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Sugar calculated as the sum of individual mono- and disaccharides (SUGAR[g] = ARAS[g] + FRUS[g] + GALS[g] + GLUS[g] + MANS[g] + RIBS[g] + XYLS[g] + LACS[g] + MALS[g] + SUCS[g] + TRES[g]) |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | Analytical method |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Calculations including conversion factors |
| Method indicator | Niacin equivalents calculated from niacin and tryptophan (NIAEQ[mg] = NIA[mg] + TRP[mg] / 60) |
| Value type | Below limit of quantification |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Weighted |
| Acquisition type | Independent laboratory |
| Method type | Analytical results |
| Method indicator | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Logical zero |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Estimated according to logical deduction |
| Method indicator | Imputation |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Imputed/estimated from related food |
| Method indicator | Imputation of a component from one or more components from related food |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Summation from constituent components |
| Method indicator | Salt equivalent calculated from sodium (NACL[g]=2.5*NA[mg]/1000.0) |
| Value type | Best estimate |
| Acquisition type | Value created within host system |
| Method type | Summation from constituent components |
| Method indicator | Carbohydrate, available calculated from sugar and starch (CHO[g] = SUGAR[g] + STARCH[g]) |